Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption in the NYC Federal Courts and Prosecutors Office (SDNY).
IRNewswires Public Corruption Investigations and Reports
Alan Reitman, JD, Ph.D., Esq., summa cum laude, Public Corruption Investigative Reporter
Meredith Kammler, LLB, LLM, Ph.D., Public Corruption Investigative Analyst.
July 26, 2021
London, UK
IRN’s lawyers have obtained a copy of Ulysses T. Ware’s July 26, 2021, filing addressed to the Hon. Edgardo Ramos, District Judge (SDNY), regarding the court’s Article III and statutory, 18 USC 3231 subject matter jurisdiction over the 04cr1224 and 05cr1115 (SDNY) criminal proceedings. In the letter to Judge Ramos, Mr. Ware contended that as a matter of law, “ipso facto” it is a legal impossibility for the United States, the plaintiff in 1224 and 1115, to establish standing and ultimately subject matter jurisdiction over 1224 and 1115. Mr. Ware placed squarely before the court the issue of whether or not the 1224 indictment actually charged a criminal contempt offense as alleged in Counts I, II, and III of the 1224 indictment?
IRN’s lawyers based on the law and a thorough and comprehensive review of the court records believe the 1224 indictment did not charge a criminal contempt offense, 18 USC 401(3). A fact that has dire pecuniary (massive monetary liability estimated at more than $2.25 billion dollars (USD)) and penal consequences (life imprisonment) for David N. Kelley, Joon Kim, Preet Bharara, Steve R. Peikin, Steven D. Feldman, Alexander H. Southwell, Nicholas S. Goldin, Maria E. Douvas, Michael J. Garcia, Katherine Polk-Failla, Sarah E. Paul, Robert A. Katzmann, Peter W. Hall, Robert W. Sweet, Barbara S. Jones, Melissa Childs, Audrey Strauss, John M. McEnany, Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., Linda T. Walker, and others as alleged by Mr. Ware.
IRN’s lawyers have reviewed the law referenced by Mr. Ware in the July 26, 2021, letter brief addressed to Judge Ramos; and concur with Mr. Ware’s legal reasoning and argument. It is the legal position of IRN and its lawyers that on November 17, 2004, David N. Kelley and the USAO lacked all probable cause to have sought and procured the 04cr1224 (SDNY) indictment while lacking probable cause to rationally and reasonably believe that Mr. Ware has committed three (3) criminal contempt, 18 USC 401(3), offenses, given the 02cv2219 (SDNY) lawsuit plaintiffs, Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), et al., (i) had judicially admitted at para. 12–13 of the 02cv2219 complaint and at para. 10.1(iv) of GX-5, to be Section 2(a)(11) statutory underwriters of IVG’s restricted securities (GX 1–4); and, (ii) given the indisputable fact (according to FINRA) the 02cv2219 plaintiffs were not on November 17, 2004, lawfully registered, as required by federal law, 15 USC 78o(a)(1), as broker-dealers.
The above indisputable facts conceded by Kelley and the USAO rendered the 1224 Indictment fatally flawed and as a matter of law, per se, ipso facto, null and void ab initio. Thus, Mr. Ware is absolutely correct in his legal arguments that the 1224 indictment failed to charge an 18 USC 401(3) criminal contempt offense; and consequently, the 04cr1224 district court (Sweet, J.) lacked all 18 USC 3231 subject matter jurisdiction over 1224 to enter any judgment of conviction or sentence. Therefore, it is the opinion of IRNewswires and its lawyers that Mr. Ware is actually and factually, as a matter of law, ipso facto, innocent of all charges in the 1224 indictment. Judge Ramos has no legal option available other than to immediately dismiss the 1224 indictment with prejudice, and reverse and vacate Mr. Ware’s illegal conviction and sentence entered in 04cr1224.
However, for very strange and unexplainable reasons Judge Edgardo Ramos has done absolutely nothing to protect Mr. Ware’s legal rights even though Mr. Ware has filed with the court a Declaration of Irreparable Harm, Injury, and Damages. In any other case other than Mr. Ware’s, a federal district court judge would have immediately acted on Mr. Ware’s emergency motions subject to the court and convened a status conference between Mr. Ware and the USAO to enable the parties to explain the cases’ procedural posture then before the court. But, Judge Ramos has taken the very highly unusual and irregular position, and in the opinion of IRN’s lawyers, unprecedented, and on its fact, biased and corrupt, position that Mr. Ware’s constitutional rights will not be protected by the district court on a timely basis.
IRN will further investigate District Judge Edgardo Ramos, the same judge currently presiding over Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt)’s litigation in SEC v. Honig, et al., 18cv08175 (SDNY). Has Judge Ramos been compromised by Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), David N. Kelley, and Dechert, LLP? IRN finds it very concerning and perplexing that Judge Ramos has done nothing to seek justice in Mr. Ware’s cases.
IRN’s investigators are currently on assignment in NYC and will leave no stone unturned regarding District Judge Edgardo Ramos, David N. Kelley, Dechert, LLP, Simpson, Thacher, & Barlett, LLP, et al., that are involved in Alpha Capital’s international Hobbs Act RICO extortion and money laundering conspiracy.
Copyright © 2021, IRNewswires News Group
All rights reserved
Cleared for domestic and international
distribution in all channels and formats.
